# Chapter 13: WikiLeaks and Information Economics

*"Transparency is the only real antidote to corruption, and in a democracy, transparency for government ought to be automatic."* -- Julian Assange^1^

## Introduction

Chapter 2 distinguished between non-scarce information content and the scarce resources required for its coordination. Building on this, and on the principles of capital formation, entrepreneurship, and sound money from Parts II and III, this chapter examines WikiLeaks as a case study in information economics. When institutions create artificial information scarcities, entrepreneurial opportunities emerge. WikiLeaks exhibits this by using technology to bridge the gap between information sources and the public, creating a market-based solution where institutional intermediaries failed due to conflicts of interest. This chapter lays the foundation for a broader theory of information markets, showing how technological innovation can serve authentic market demand for transparency and coordination.

## 13.1 Information Economics: Theoretical Foundation

Traditional economics treats information sharing as a "public good" requiring government intervention due to non-rivalrous consumption and network externalities. Economic analysis reveals something fundamentally different: information faces coordination challenges, not market failures. The challenge isn't that information markets can't work--it's that existing institutions create barriers to authentic information coordination.^1^

Information coordination emerges via entrepreneurial discovery when individuals can assess coordination benefits without institutional mandates requiring universal transparency or privacy. This creates three distinct layers of analysis:

**Individual Layer** (Action Axiom): Information sharing emerges from purposeful evaluation of coordination benefits versus privacy costs, with individual assessment superior to centralized rules because actors possess specific knowledge about their coordination requirements, risk tolerances, and strategic positions.

**Social Layer** (Argumentation Axiom): Information verification develops via competitive reputation mechanisms and peer networks that establish credibility using demonstrated accuracy instead of institutional authority, supporting market coordination across diverse contexts without requiring trust in central authorities.

**Systemic Layer** (Resistance Axiom): Information coordination systems can resist institutional capture and manipulation using technological infrastructure that creates competitive alternatives to centralized information intermediaries, supporting sustainable coordination independent of political control.

This three-layer framework provides analytical foundation for examining technological implementations of information economics across verification systems, social coordination, and market integration--the progression developed throughout Part IV.

## 13.2 WikiLeaks Case Study: Entrepreneurial Information Coordination

Julian Assange's WikiLeaks provides a concrete demonstration of information economics in practice. Where institutions claimed "national security" or "proprietary information" to maintain coordination barriers, WikiLeaks identified an entrepreneurial opportunity: bridging the gap between information producers (sources) and information consumers (public) through technological coordination infrastructure.^2^

The entrepreneurial elements include recognition of reputation and social benefit opportunities from solving coordination problems institutions couldn't address due to conflicts of interest. Technical innovation using anonymous submission systems, cryptographic verification, and global distribution infrastructure solved specific coordination challenges. Market discovery showed proven demand for independent information verification using voluntary support and global adoption.

WikiLeaks built competitive verification systems using technological instead of institutional means--source protection supporting disclosure, cryptographic verification establishing credibility, distributed publication resisting censorship attempts. This infrastructure addressed all three information layers: individual source protection, social verification mechanisms, and systemic resistance to institutional capture.

The global response demonstrated market demand for independent information coordination. Sources provided information voluntarily, readers supported the platform financially, journalists integrated leaked materials into broader reporting--revealing authentic coordination benefits through market mechanisms rather than institutional mandates.

## 13.3 Privacy-Transparency Synthesis: Technological Resolution

The apparent tension between privacy protection and information transparency dissolves when viewed through Austrian coordination theory. The conflict exists only under institutional frameworks requiring binary choices--universal transparency or universal privacy. Information economics enables selective, purposeful disclosure through technological coordination infrastructure.^3^

Technical coordination solutions include cryptographic anonymity addressing the fundamental barrier preventing valuable information disclosure--source vulnerability to retaliation. Mathematical rather than institutional verification establishes information credibility without requiring trust in authorities. Decentralized publishing resists censorship while enabling global access to verified information.

Privacy technologies support instead of constraining beneficial information sharing by addressing coordination barriers that prevent voluntary disclosure. When sources can share information without sacrifice of personal security, when verification operates independent of institutional authority, when distribution resists centralized control--information coordination approaches ideals of voluntary cooperation serving individual autonomy while supporting complex social coordination.

## 13.4 Market Evolution and System Architecture

Building on WikiLeaks' proven feasibility, information coordination markets continue developing via entrepreneurial discovery--creating infrastructure supporting information economics across diverse domains. This establishes the foundation for technological implementations examined in Chapters 14-15.^4^

Emerging coordination infrastructure includes mathematical proof methods supporting selective disclosure (Chapter 14), decentralized platforms implementing spontaneous order (Chapter 15), and comprehensive coordination infrastructure serving privacy and transparency simultaneously.

Information coordination shows how technological infrastructure can implement coordination principles at scale--preserving individual autonomy while supporting complex voluntary cooperation. The progression from WikiLeaks' breakthrough to systematic verification technology and social coordination platforms validates insights about market solutions to institutional coordination failures.

This foundational analysis provides the framework for examining specific technological implementations that extend information economics across verification systems and social coordination domains.

## 13.5 Information Market Theory: Kinsella's Framework Applied

Stephan Kinsella's Austrian information economics provides rigorous theoretical foundation for understanding WikiLeaks and information coordination innovations. Where mainstream economics treats information as "public good" requiring state provision, Kinsella demonstrates how information markets operate through voluntary coordination mechanisms without requiring intellectual property monopolies or government intervention.^5^

Carol's academic research experience with information coordination validates Kinsella's theoretical distinction between information content and coordination services. Her international scholarly collaboration across politically sensitive research topics required developing systematic information sharing protocols that traditional academic institutions could not provide due to surveillance vulnerability and political pressure. Carol's implementation of cryptographic document verification for collaborative research papers illustrates Kinsella's insight that information markets operate through coordination services rather than content control. Her development of peer-to-peer academic networks for sharing preliminary research findings demonstrates how competitive reputation mechanisms establish credibility through demonstrated accuracy rather than institutional authority. The coordination infrastructure Carol developed for international privacy technology research--secure submission systems for sensitive papers, cryptographic verification establishing scholarly credibility, and distributed publication resisting institutional censorship--proves that academic information markets succeed through voluntary coordination serving authentic research needs rather than institutional mandate or regulatory compliance.

Kinsella's central insight distinguishes between information content (non-rivalrous) and information coordination services (requiring scarce resources). WikiLeaks validates this distinction--the leaked documents themselves impose no scarcity, but the coordination services (secure submission, verification, distribution, analysis) require genuine economic resources and entrepreneurial innovation. This explains why WikiLeaks succeeded where traditional journalism failed: by focusing on coordination services rather than content control.

Austrian information market theory explains quality control through competitive reputation mechanisms rather than institutional authority. WikiLeaks established credibility through consistent accuracy and verification procedures, creating market incentives for reliable information rather than sensationalized reporting. Competitive information providers must maintain reputation capital through demonstrated accuracy, creating market solution to information quality problems that institutional media couldn't solve due to political constraints and regulatory capture.

Recent information economics research confirms Austrian insights about market coordination superiority over institutional control. Yochai Benkler's analysis of peer production, Clay Shirky's work on voluntary organization, and Hal Varian's network economics show how technological infrastructure supports Austrian coordination principles at unprecedented scale, validating theoretical predictions about information market development.^6^

Kinsella's framework explains why technological innovation consistently outpaces institutional reform in information coordination domains. Entrepreneurs can identify coordination problems and implement technological solutions faster than institutions can adapt regulatory frameworks, creating systematic advantages for market-based over political solutions to information challenges. WikiLeaks represents paradigmatic example of entrepreneurial discovery addressing coordination problems through technological innovation rather than political reform.

Austrian information market theory resolves apparent public goods problems through voluntary coordination mechanisms. Where mainstream economics sees market failure requiring state intervention, Austrian analysis identifies entrepreneurial opportunities for coordination innovation. Information markets develop via competitive service provision, voluntary adoption, and reputation-based quality control--showing market solutions to coordination challenges without requiring coercive provision or intellectual property monopolization.

Hülsmann's ethics of money production framework reveals systematic parallels between monetary manipulation and information manipulation that illuminate WikiLeaks' breakthrough coordination innovation.^7^ Just as central banking creates artificial information asymmetries by controlling monetary policy knowledge, institutional media creates systematic information asymmetries using selective disclosure serving political instead of coordination objectives.

WikiLeaks addresses information "debasement" analogous to monetary debasement that Hülsmann identifies as systematic theft. Government classification systems and institutional media gatekeeping create artificial scarcity in information markets parallel to how central banking creates artificial scarcity in monetary markets through privileged access to money creation. The first users of classified information (political insiders) benefit systematically at the expense of later users (public) who receive filtered, delayed, or manipulated versions.

Building on Hülsmann's monetary ethics, information disclosure becomes individual moral obligation when existing institutional systems operate through systematic deception and coordination manipulation. WikiLeaks demonstrates that sound information principles--predictable policy, verification authenticity, resistance to arbitrary manipulation--can be implemented through technological rather than institutional means.

This systematic approach validates Austrian insights about market solutions to coordination problems while establishing ethical foundation for technological information systems examined in Chapters 14-15. Information markets, like monetary markets, serve coordination needs best when resistant to institutional manipulation through mathematical rather than political constraints.

This theoretical framework provides foundation for examining advanced coordination technologies (zero-knowledge proofs, decentralized social networks) that implement Austrian information market principles through technological infrastructure enabling voluntary coordination at scale.

## Chapter Summary

WikiLeaks represents entrepreneurial solution to information coordination challenges through market mechanisms rather than institutional mandate. Information sharing occurs through voluntary participation enabling consensual transparency while preserving source privacy, demonstrating coordination solutions to apparent public goods challenges.

Competitive information verification and distribution systems serve coordination needs through voluntary adoption rather than monopolistic provision. WikiLeaks enables voluntary information sharing arrangements that create mutual benefit while preserving individual autonomy, expanding coordination possibilities beyond institutional constraints.

Information economics operates through voluntary sharing mechanisms that preserve individual autonomy while enabling beneficial coordination. Information markets develop through entrepreneurial discovery and competitive innovation serving authentic coordination needs, providing foundation for examining advanced verification and coordination systems building on voluntary information sharing principles.

---

## Footnotes

^1^ Julian Assange, *When Google Met WikiLeaks* (New York: OR Books, 2014), 67. Assange's perspective on transparency as a market mechanism for accountability demonstrates cypherpunk approach to information coordination challenges. For comprehensive background, see Julian Assange with Jacob Appelbaum, Andy Müller-Maguhn, and Jérémie Zimmermann, *Cypherpunks: Freedom and the Future of the Internet* (New York: OR Books, 2012), and Julian Assange, *The WikiLeaks Files: The World According to US Empire* (London: Verso, 2015).

^2^ Friedrich A. Hayek, *The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism* (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988), 76. This insight into the limits of constructivist rationalism provides Austrian foundation for understanding market solutions to information coordination challenges. For development of this theme, see Friedrich A. Hayek, *The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason* (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1979), and *Law, Legislation and Liberty*, vol. 2: *The Mirage of Social Justice* (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976), chapters 8-9.

^3^ Murray N. Rothbard, *Man, Economy, and State with Power and Market*, Scholar's Edition (Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2009), 883-890. Rothbard's analysis of public goods demonstrates Austrian alternative to mainstream "market failure" theory through voluntary coordination mechanisms. For comprehensive Austrian public goods analysis, see Hans-Hermann Hoppe, *The Myth of National Defense: Essays on the Theory and History of Security Production* (Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2003), and Walter Block, "Public Goods and Externalities: The Case of Roads," *Journal of Libertarian Studies* 7, no. 1 (1983): 1-34.

^4^ Israel M. Kirzner, *Competition and Entrepreneurship* (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973), 65-87. Kirznerian entrepreneurial discovery explains how market participants recognize profit opportunities through superior awareness of coordination problems and potential solutions. For applications to information markets, see Israel M. Kirzner, *Discovery and the Capitalist Process* (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985), chapters 1-3, and Peter G. Klein, "Opportunity Discovery, Entrepreneurial Action, and Economic Organization," *Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal* 2, no. 3 (2008): 175-190.

^5^ Stephan Kinsella, *Against Intellectual Property*, rev. ed. (Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2008), 15-45. Kinsella's theoretical framework demonstrates how information markets operate through voluntary coordination mechanisms without requiring intellectual property monopolies. For comprehensive development, see Stephan Kinsella, "The Economics of Intellectual Property," in *Property, Freedom, and Society: Essays in Honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe*, ed. Jörg Guido Hülsmann and Stephan Kinsella (Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2009), 137-156, and "There's No Such Thing as a Free Patent: The Economics of Intellectual Property," *Mises Daily*, September 1, 2005.

^6^ Yochai Benkler, *The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom* (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006), 59-90, demonstrates peer production validating Austrian insights about voluntary coordination. Clay Shirky, *Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations* (New York: Penguin Press, 2008), 81-108, shows technological infrastructure enabling spontaneous order. Hal R. Varian, "Economics of Information Technology," working paper, University of California Berkeley, 2003, provides network economics analysis confirming Austrian market process theory in information domains.

^7^ Jörg Guido Hülsmann, *The Ethics of Money Production* (Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2008), chapters 1-4. Hülsmann's analysis of monetary manipulation and information asymmetries provides systematic framework for evaluating information disclosure ethics that parallels his monetary ethics. For comprehensive treatment of information debasement parallels, see Hülsmann's analysis of first-user advantages and systematic wealth transfer through privileged information access. This framework extends naturally to information market analysis where classification systems create artificial scarcitudes analogous to monetary manipulation enabling political control through coordination restriction.